THE ADJACENCY MATRIX RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM FOR CAUSAL GRAPH MODELS IN THE ABSENCE OF OBSERVABLE VARIABLES
Abstract
The paper deals with the problem of modeling complex systems in the absence of observable
variables. To solve this problem, it is proposed to use causal graph models. The class of causal
models considered here is defined as non-stochastic causal models with unobservable variables.
These models are presented in the form of a directed graph, created on the basis of human mental
representations. In this case, on the arcs, causality is expressed in the form of some marks with a
sign that determines the direction of change in the state of the system. The considered causal models
include heterogeneous, complex and qualitative types of variables that illustrate the nonnumerical
nature of nodes and links and, as a consequence, the absence and impossibility of obtaining
time series data. In the absence of observable variables and the impossibility of conducting
experiments, the problem of reconstructing the adjacency matrix of the causal graph model becomes
much more complicated. It is required to obtain a model with a certain spectral decomposition
that implements the main function of the modeled system. Based on this concept, a new method
for reconstructing the adjacency matrix is proposed, implemented on the basis of the corresponding
causal propagation matrix or transmission matrix. The idea is to use combinatorial optimization
based on spectral graph theory to generate data from a qualitative non-stochastic causal
model and reconstruct an adjacency matrix using that data. In this case, the eigenvectors are
identified as key objectives of the matrix reconstruction process, which postulates a fundamental
approach based on the spectral properties of the graph. The results of computational experiments
on solving the problem of reconstructing the adjacency matrix for causal graph models in the absence
of observable variables using the developed algorithm have shown that the algorithm effectively
reconstructs matrices from the given parameters with admissible similarity indices. The
convergence of the approximation to the solution of the matrix reconstruction algorithm is proved
no slower than with the speed of a geometric progression. From a technical point of view, the
advantage of the algorithm is the implementation of a tool for automatic adjustment of the regularization
parameter, suitable for users without prior mathematical knowledge.
References
2. Pandey B. et al. A comprehensive survey of edge prediction in social networks: Techniques,
parameters and challenges, Expert Syst. Appl., 2019, Vol. 124, pp. 164-181.
3. Delgado F.M., Gómez-Vela F. Computational methods for Gene Regulatory Networks
reconstruction and analysis: A review, Artif. Intell. Med., 2019, Vol. 95, pp. 133-145.
4. Wu X. et al. Analyses and applications of optimization methods for complex network
reconstruction, Knowledge-Based Syst., 2020, Vol. 193, pp. 105406.
5. Han X. et al. Robust Reconstruction of Complex Networks from Sparse Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
2015, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 028701.
6. Wang W.-X. et al. Network Reconstruction Based on Evolutionary-Game Data via
Compressive Sensing, Phys. Rev. X, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 021021.
7. Shen Z. et al. Reconstructing propagation networks with natural diversity and identifying
hidden sources, Nat. Commun., 2014, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 4323.
8. Squartini T. et al. Reconstruction methods for networks: The case of economic and financial
systems, Phys. Rep., 2018, Vol. 757, pp. 1–47.
9. Shahrampour S., Preciado V.M. Topology Identification of Directed Dynamical Networks via
Power Spectral Analysis, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 2015, Vol. 60, No. 8, pp. 2260-2265.
10. Wang W. et al. Kernel framework based on non-negative matrix factorization for networks
reconstruction and link prediction, Knowledge-Based Syst., 2017, Vol. 137, pp. 104-114.
11. Wang Y.X.R., Huang H. Review on statistical methods for gene network reconstruction using
expression data, J. Theor. Biol., 2014, Vol. 362, pp. 53-61.
12. Napoletani D., Sauer T.D. Reconstructing the topology of sparsely connected dynamical
networks, Phys. Rev. E, 2008, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 026103.
13. Timme M. Revealing Network Connectivity from Response Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007,
Vol. 98, No. 22, pp. 224101.
14. Yu D., Righero M., Kocarev L. Estimating Topology of Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006,
Vol. 97, No. 18, pp. 188701.
15. Zhang Z. et al. Reconstruction of dynamic networks with time-delayed interactions in the
presence of fast-varying noises, Phys. Rev. E, 2019, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 042311.
16. Bongard J., Lipson H. Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci., 2007, Vol. 104, No. 24, pp. 9943-9948.
17. Li S. et al. Network reconstruction by linear dynamics, Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl., 2014,
Vol. 404, pp. 118-125.
18. Barranca V.J., Zhou D., Cai D. Compressive sensing reconstruction of feed-forward
connectivity in pulse-coupled nonlinear networks, Phys. Rev. E, 2016, Vol. 93, No. 6,
pp. 060201.
19. Simić S.K., Stanić Z. Polynomial reconstruction of signed graphs, Linear Algebra Appl., 2016,
Vol. 501, pp. 390-408.
20. Simić S.K., Stanić Z. On the polynomial reconstruction of graphs whose vertex-deleted
subgraphs have spectra bounded from below by −2, Linear Algebra Appl., 2008, Vol. 428, No.
8–9, pp. 1865-1873.
21. Sciriha I. Graphs with a common eigenvalue deck, Linear Algebra Appl., 2009, Vol. 430,
No. 1, pp. 78-85.
22. Wang W., Xu C.-X. Some results on the spectral reconstruction problem, Linear Algebra Appl.,
2007, Vol. 427, No. 1, pp. 151-159.
23. Bunimovich L., Shu L. Generalized eigenvectors of isospectral transformations, spectral
equivalence and reconstruction of original networks, Linear Algebra Appl., 2018, Vol. 551,
pp. 104-124.
24. Xu K. et al. Discovering target groups in social networking sites: An effective method for
maximizing joint influential power, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 2012, Vol. 11, No. 4,
pp. 318-334.
25. Wang C.-L., Li C., Wang J. Comparisons of several algorithms for Toeplitz matrix recovery,
Comput. Math. with Appl., 2016, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 133-146.
26. Kavanagh R.J. The application of matrix methods to multi-variable control systems,
J. Franklin Inst., 1956, Vol. 262, No. 5, pp. 349-367.
27. Bertsekas D.P. The Method of Multipliers for Equality Constrained Problems, Constrained
Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods. Elsevier, 1982, pp. 95-157.
28. Tikhonov A., Arsenin V. Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. New York: Wiley, 1977.
29. Pedrycz W., Homenda W. From Fuzzy Cognitive Maps to Granular Cognitive Maps, IEEE
Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2014, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 859-869.
30. Kim D.-H. Cognitive Maps of Policy Makers on Financial Crises of South Korea and
Malaysia: A Comparative Study, Int. Rev. Public Adm., 2004, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 31-38.
31. Büyüközkan G., Vardaloğlu Z. Analyzing of CPFR success factors using fuzzy cognitive maps
in retail industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 2012, Vol. 39, No. 12, pp. 10438-10455.
32. Tselykh A., Tselykh L. Methodology for comparative cognitive modeling based on the analysis
of fuzzy target and control factors, Izv. SFedU. Eng. Sci., 2015, Vol. 7 (168), pp. 101-115.
33. Poczeta K., Kubuś Ł., Yastrebov A. Analysis of an evolutionary algorithm for complex fuzzy
cognitive map learning based on graph theory metrics and output concepts, Biosystems, 2019,
Vol. 179, pp. 39-47.