INTEGRATION OF A RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK TO INCREASE THE FAILURE TOLERANCE OF THE MOISTURE TRANSFER MODEL IN THE SMART GARDEN SYSTEM

Abstract

The paper presents a study on the development and integration of a recurrent neural network (RNN) to improve the accuracy and fault tolerance of a moisture transfer model in a smart garden system. The problem of soil moisture control is becoming especially relevant in modern agricultural and environmental monitoring, where high accuracy is required to manage water resources, forecast crop yields and prevent drought periods. Traditional methods, such as remote sensing and moisture transfer models, have significant limitations: low accuracy, computational complexity, dependence on accurate sensor data and difficulty in applying in real field conditions. To solve these problems, the study proposes the use of RNN, which is able to effectively process time series data and predict soil moisture even in the presence of incomplete, inaccurate or distorted input data. The global soil moisture dataset GSSM and weather data from the Meteostat platform were used as initial data, which made it possible to take into account the climatic features of regions with different soil types. The model includes a long short-term memory (LSTM) layer and a fully connected layer for the final forecast. Particular attention is paid to data preprocessing, including calculating average daily, average monthly and average annual values, as well as data correction taking into account the characteristics of different soil types. The study showed that the developed RNN model is highly resistant to sensor failures, has minimal dependence on the volume of input data and is able to adapt to different climatic and soil conditions. The proposed solution improves the accuracy of soil moisture monitoring in the Smart Garden system, optimizes the use of water resources and increases the stability of the system in the face of changing external factors. Thus, the integration of RNN opens up new opportunities for the development of agriculture and ecology, ensuring more efficient water resource management and increasing the productivity of agrosystems

Authors

References

1. Anagnostopoulos V. et al. A modernized version of a 1D soil vegetation atmosphere transfer model for improving its future use in land surface interactions studies, Environmental Modelling & Software, 2017, Vol. 90, pp. 147-156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.004.

2. Gili P. et al. An unmanned lighter-than-air platform for large scale land monitoring, Remote Sensing, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 13, pp. 2523. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132523.

3. Sadeghi M. et al. The optical trapezoid model: A novel approach to remote sensing of soil moisture ap-plied to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 observations, Remote sensing of environment, 2017, Vol. 198,

pp. 52-68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.041.

4. Dubois P.C., Van Zyl J., Engman T. Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars, IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 1995, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 915-926.

5. Oh Y., Sarabandi K., Ulaby F.T. An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces, IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1992, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 370-381. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/36.134086.

6. Attema E.P.W., Ulaby F.T. Vegetation modeled as a water cloud, Radio science, 1978, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 357-364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/RS013i002p00357.

7. Rice S.O. Reflection of electromagnetic waves from slightly rough surfaces, Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 1951, Vol. 4, No. 2-3, pp. 351-378. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ cpa.3160040206.

8. Beckmann P., Spizzichino A. The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces, Norwood, 1987.

9. Fung A.K., Li Z., Chen K.S. Backscattering from a randomly rough dielectric surface, IEEE Transac-tions on Geoscience and remote sensing, 1992, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 356-369. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/36.134085.

10. Shi J. et al. A parameterized multifrequency-polarization surface emission model, IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2005, Vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 2831-2841. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.857902.

11. Njoku E.G. et al. Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E, IEEE transactions on Geoscience and remote sensing, 2003, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 215-229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808243.

12. Kui L. et al. Wide-area soil moisture retrieval using SAR images and multispectral data, Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020, Vol. 36 (7), pp. 134-140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.07.015.

13. Wu S. et al. Joint retrieval of soil moisture from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 remote sensing data based on neural network algorithm, Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 636-644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.20190419001.

14. Chen S. et al. Spatial downscaling methods of soil moisture based on multisource remote sensing data and its application, Water, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 1401. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/w11071401.

15. Zhao W. et al. A spatial downscaling approach for the SMAP passive surface soil moisture product using random forest regression, Journal of hydrology, 2018, Vol. 563, pp. 1009-1024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.081.

16. Zhang Q. Precision agriculture technology for crop farming. Taylor & Francis, 2016, 374 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/b19336.

17. Slin'ko O.V., Kondrat'ev O.V. Robotizirovannye sredstva v sadovodstve [Robotic tools in horticulture], Teoriya i praktika sovremennoy agrarnoy nauki [Theory and practice of modern agricultural science], 2022, pp. 615-618.

18. Kondrat'eva O.V., Slin'ko O.V., Fedorov A.D. Razvitie robotizirovannykh sistem v sadovodstve [Devel-opment of robotic systems in horticulture], Agropromyshlennyy kompleks: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Agro-industrial complex: problems and development prospects], 2023, pp. 100-106.

19. Stafford J. et al. Precision agriculture for sustainability. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited, 2019, 494 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351114592.

20. Philip J.R. The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution, Soil science, 1957, Vol. 83, No. 5, pp. 345-358. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195705000-00002.

21. Despommier D. The vertical farm: Feeding the world in the 21st century. New York: St. – Martin's Press, 2010, 159 p.

22. Wang Y. et al. GSSM: A global seamless soil moisture dataset from 1981 to 2022 matching CCI to SMAP with a novel bias correction method, Earth System Science Data Discussions, 2024, Vol. 2024, pp. 1-27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-200.

23. Lamprecht C. Meteostat API. Available at: https://meteostat.net/en/blog/introduction-meteostat-rapidapi.

Скачивания

Published:

2025-10-01

Issue:

Section:

SECTION IV. MACHINE LEARNING AND NEURAL NETWORKS

Keywords:

Recurrent neural network, soil moisture transfer, Smart Garden, fault tolerance, forecasting

For citation:

S.S. Obaid , V.А. Pogonin , I.B. Kirina INTEGRATION OF A RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK TO INCREASE THE FAILURE TOLERANCE OF THE MOISTURE TRANSFER MODEL IN THE SMART GARDEN SYSTEM. IZVESTIYA SFedU. ENGINEERING SCIENCES – 2025. - № 4. – P. 284-297.