MODERN METHODS OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE PROCESSING: SYSTEM ANALYSIS, ALGORITHMS AND PROSPECTS FOR APPLICATION IN CONSTRUCTION DIAGNOSTICS

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the growing interest in hyperspectral imaging as a tool for non-destructive testing of building materials and structures, as well as by the insufficient systematization of modern methods for processing such data. The aim of the work is to provide a systematic analysis of HSI processing algorithms, identify their advantages and limitations, and determine the prospects for their application in construction diagnostics. The study examines the specific features of hyperspectral data, including high dimensionality, noise, calibration errors, atmospheric distortions, and the shortage of labeled datasets. The evolution of approaches is shown: from classical machine learning methods and manual feature engineering to deep neural networks. Dimensionality reduction methods, kNN classifiers, Bayesian models, logistic regression, Random Forest, SVM, and MLP are analyzed, along with methods for incorporating spectral-spatial context. Special attention is paid to modern deep learning architectures: 1D, 2D, and 3D CNNs, RNNs, LSTM/GRU models, hybrid CNN–RNN models, transformers, and CNN–Transformer schemes. Transfer learning, semi-supervised learning, self-supervised learning, few-shot learning, meta-learning, and domain adaptation are considered separately as ways to overcome the limited availability of labeled data. The approaches are compared in terms of data requirements, computational complexity, robustness to noise, and their ability to account for spectral and spatial dependencies. It is shown that the most promising models for construction diagnostics are hybrid models that combine local convolutional features, the global context of attention mechanisms, and the possibility of fine-tuning on small specialized datasets. The paper summarizes the current state of the field and forms a basis for selecting methods for defect detection, moisture assessment, corrosion analysis, and evaluation of degradation in building structures. The conclusions formulated in the study can be used when designing experimental protocols and selecting architectures for further applied research in the field of building monitoring

##article.references##

1. Goetz A.F.H., Vane G., Solomon J.E., Rock B.N. Imaging Spectrometry for Earth Remote Sensing, Sci-ence, 1985, Vol. 228, No. 4704, pp. 1147-1153. DOI: 10.1126/science.228.4704.1147.

2. Ahmad M., Distefano S., Khan A.M., Mazzara M., Li C., Li H., Aryal J., Ding Y., Vivone G., Hong D. A comprehensive survey for hyperspectral image classification: The evolution from conventional to transformers and Mamba models, Neurocomputing, 2024, Vol. 644, Art. 130428. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130428.

3. Hong D., Han Z., Yao J., Gao L., Zhang B., Plaza A., Chanussot J. SpectralFormer: Rethinking Hyper-spectral Image Classification with Transformers, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens-ing, 2022, Vol. 60, pp. 1-15, Art. 5518615. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3130716.

4. Li S., Strauss A., Grba D., Granzner M., Täubling-Fruleux B., Zimmermann T. Hyperspectral Signa-tures for Detecting the Concrete Hydration Process Using Neural Networks, Infrastructures, 2025, Vol. 10, No. 7, Art. 172. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures10070172.

5. Cheng M.F., Mukundan A., Karmakar R., Valappil M.A.E., Jouhar J., Wang H.-C. Modern Trends and Recent Applications of Hyperspectral Imaging: A Review, Technologies, 2025, Vol. 13, Art. 170. DOI: 10.3390/technologies13050170.

6. Grill J.B., Strub F., Altché F., Tallec C., Richemond P.H., Buchatskaya E., Doersch C., Avila Pires B., Guo Z.D., Gheshlaghi Azar M., Piot B., Kavukcuoglu K., Munos R., Valko M. Bootstrap your own la-tent: A new approach to self-supervised learning, arXiv, 2020. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.07733.

7. Bioucas-Dias J.M., Plaza A., Camps-Valls G., Scheunders P., Nasrabadi N.M., Chanussot J. Hyper-spectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 6-36. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2013.2244672.

8. Karantzalos K., Karakizi C., Kandylakis Z., Antoniou G. HyRANK Hyperspectral Satellite Dataset I [Dataset]. Zenodo, 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1222202.

9. Li H., Cui J., Zhang X., Han Y., Cao L. Dimensionality Reduction and Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Feature Extraction, Remote Sensing, 2022, Vol. 14, No. 18, Art. 4579. DOI: 10.3390/rs14184579.

10. Roweis S.T., Saul L. K. Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding, Science, 2000, Vol. 290, No. 5500, pp. 2323-2326. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2323.

11. McInnes L., Healy J., Saul N., Großberger L. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projec-tion, Journal of Open Source Software, 2018, Vol. 3, No. 29, Art. 861. DOI: 10.21105/joss.00861.

12. Chen S., Hu Y., Xu S., Li L., Cheng Y. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing imagery by k-nearest-neighbor simplex based on adaptive C-mutual proportion standard deviation metric, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2014, Vol. 8, No. 1, Art. 083578. DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.8.083578.

13. Cao F., Yang Z., Ren J., Ling W.-K., Zhao H., Marshall S. Extreme Sparse Multinomial Logistic Re-gression: A Fast and Robust Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Remote Sensing, 2017, Vol. 9, No. 12, Art. 1255. DOI: 10.3390/rs9121255.

14. Goel P.K., Prasher S.O., Patel R.M., Landry J.-A., Bonnell R.B., Viau A.A. Classification of hyperspec-tral data by decision trees and artificial neural networks to identify weed stress and nitrogen status of corn, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2003, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 67-93. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1699(03)00020-6.

15. Ham J., Chen Y., Crawford M.M., Ghosh J. Investigation of the Random Forest Framework for Classi-fication of Hyperspectral Data, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 492-501. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.842481.

16. Mountrakis G., Im J., Ogole C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 247-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001.

17. Melgani F., Bruzzone L. Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images with Support Vector Machines, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 1778-1790. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865.

18. Subramanian S., Ramakrishnan S. Methodology for hyperspectral image classification using novel neu-ral network, Proc. SPIE, 1997, Vol. 3071: Algorithms for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imagery III. DOI: 10.1117/12.280589.

19. Plaza J., Plaza A., Perez R., Martinez P. On the use of small training sets for neural network-based characterization of mixed pixels in remotely sensed hyperspectral images, Pattern Recognition, 2009, Vol. 42, pp. 3032-3045. DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.04.008.

20. Merenyi E., Farrand W. H., Taranik J.V., Minor T.B. Classification of hyperspectral imagery with neu-ral networks: comparison to conventional tools, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2014, Art. 71. DOI: 10.1186/1687-6180-2014-71.

21. Wang L., Shi C., Diao C., Ji W., Yin D. A survey of methods incorporating spatial information in image classification and spectral unmixing, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, Vol. 37,

No. 16, pp. 3870-3910. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1204032.

22. Benediktsson J.A., Palmason J.A., Sveinsson J.R. Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 480-491. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.842478.

23. Li J., Bioucas-Dias J.M., Plaza A. Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using Subspace Multinomial Logistic Regression and Markov Random Fields, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 809-823. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2162649.

24. Fauvel M., Benediktsson J.A., Chanussot J., Sveinsson J.R. Spectral and Spatial Classification of Hyper-spectral Data Using SVMs and Morphological Profiles, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2008, Vol. 46, No. 11, pp. 3804-3814. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.922034.

25. Green A.A., Berman M., Switzer P., Craig M.D. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Re-mote Sensing, 1988, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 65-74. DOI: 10.1109/36.3001.

26. Cheriyadat A., Bruce L.M. Why principal component analysis is not an appropriate feature extraction method for hyperspectral data, Proc. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2003, Vol. 6, pp. 3420-3422. DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1294808.

27. Camps-Valls G., Tuia D., Bruzzone L., Benediktsson J.A. Advances in hyperspectral image classifica-tion: Earth monitoring with statistical learning methods, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2014, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 45-54. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2013.2279179.

28. Rasti B., Hong D., Hang R., Ghamisi P., Kang X., Chanussot J., Benediktsson J.A. Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral Imagery: The Evolution from Shallow to Deep: Overview and Toolbox, IEEE Geosci-ence and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2020, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 60-88. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2020.2979764.

29. Zhou J., Zeng S., Xiao Z., Zhou J., Li H., Kang Z. An Enhanced Spectral Fusion 3D CNN Model for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Remote Sensing, 2022, Vol. 14, No. 21, Art. 5334. DOI: 10.3390/rs14215334.

30. Hu W., Huang Y., Wei L., Zhang F., Li H. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Journal of Sensors, 2015, Vol. 2015, Art. 258619. DOI: 10.1155/2015/258619.

31. Yue J., Zhao W., Mao S., Liu H. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images using deep con-volutional neural networks, Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 468-477. DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1047045.

32. Mou L., Ghamisi P., Zhu X.X. Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, Vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 3639-3655. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2636241.

33. Hochreiter S., Schmidhuber J. Long Short-Term Memory, Neural Computation, 1997, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 1735-1780. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.

34. Liu Q., Zhou F., Hang R., Yuan X. Bidirectional-Convolutional LSTM Based Spectral-Spatial Feature Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Remote Sensing, 2017, Vol. 9, No. 12, Art. 1330. DOI: 10.3390/rs9121330.

35. Zhou F., Hang R., Liu Q., Yuan X. Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Spectral-Spatial LSTMs, Neurocomputing, 2019, Vol. 328, pp. 39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.02.105.

36. Wu H., Prasad S. Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Data Classification, Remote Sensing, 2017, Vol. 9, No. 3, Art. 298. DOI: 10.3390/rs9030298.

37. Hu W.S., Li H.C., Pan L., Li W., Tao R., Du Q. Spatial-Spectral Feature Extraction via Deep Con-vLSTM Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 4237-4250. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2961947.

38. Qi W., Zhang X., Wang N., Zhang M., CenY. A Spectral-Spatial Cascaded 3D Convolutional Neural Network with a Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Network for Hyperspectral Image Classifica-tion, Remote Sensing, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 20, Art. 2363. DOI: 10.3390/rs11202363.

39. Yin J., Qi C., Chen Q., Qu J. Spatial-Spectral Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification: A 3-D CNN and Bi-LSTM Framework, Remote Sensing, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 12, Art. 2353. DOI: 10.3390/rs13122353.

40. Farooque G., Xiao L., Yang J., Sargano A.B. Hyperspectral Image Classification via a Novel Spectral–Spatial 3D ConvLSTM-CNN, Remote Sensing, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 21, Art. 4348. DOI: 10.3390/rs13214348.

41. Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L., Gomez A.N., Kaiser Ł., Polosukhin I. At-tention Is All You Need, arXiv, 2017. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762.

42. Dosovitskiy A., Beyer L., Kolesnikov A., Weissenborn D., Zhai X., Unterthiner T., Dehghani M., Mind-erer M., Heigold G., Gelly S., Uszkoreit J., Houlsby N. An Image is Worth 16×16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale, arXi, 2020. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929.

43. He J., Zhao L., Yang H., Zhang M., Li W. HSI-BERT: Hyperspectral Image Classification Using the Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Re-mote Sensing, 2020, No. 58 (1), pp. 165-178. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2934760.

44. Yu H., Xu Z., Zheng K., Hong D., Yang H., Song M. MSTNet: A Multilevel Spectral-Spatial Transform-er Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, No. 60, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3186400.

45. Yang X., Cao W., Lu Y., Zhou Y. Hyperspectral Image Transformer Classification Networks, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, Vol. 60, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3171551.

46. Yuan D., Yu D., Qian Y., Xu Y., Liu Y. S2Former: Parallel Spectral-Spatial Transformer for Hyperspec-tral Image Classification, Electronics, 2023, Vol. 12, No. 18, Art. 3937. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12183937.

47. Wang D., Zhang J., Du B., Zhang L., Tao D. DCN-T: Dual Context Network with Transformer for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2023, No. 32, pp. 2536-2551. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2023.3270104.

48. Zhang B., Chen Y., Rong Y., Xiong S., Lu X. MATNet: A Combining Multi-Attention and Transformer Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens-ing, 2023, No. 61, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3254523.

49. Sun L., Zhao G., Zheng Y., Wu Z. Spectral-Spatial Feature Tokenization Transformer for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, No. 60, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3144158.

50. Xu R., Dong X.-M., Li W., Peng J., Sun W., Xu Y. DBCTNet: Double-Branch Convolution–Transformer Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens-ing, 2024, No. 62, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3368141.

51. Qi W., Huang C., Wang Y., Zhang X., Sun W., Zhang L. Global-Local Three-Dimensional Convolution-al Transformer Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, No. 61, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3272885.

52. Wang X.Y., Hu Q., Cheng Y.S., Ma J.Y. Hyperspectral Image Super-Resolution Meets Deep Learning: A Survey and Perspective, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2023, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1668-1691. DOI: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123681.

53. He X., Chen Y., Lin Z. Spatial-Spectral Transformer for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Remote Sensing, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 3, Art. 498. DOI: 10.3390/rs13030498.

54. Wang W., Liu L., Zhang T., Shen J., Wang J., Li J. Hyper-ES2T: Efficient Spatial–Spectral Transformer for the Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2022, Vol. 113, Art. 103005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103005.

55. Ji Y., Shi J., Zhang Y., Yang H., Zong Y., Xu L. HyFormer: Hybrid Grouping-Aggregation Transformer and Wide-Spanning CNN for Hyperspectral Image Super-Resolution, Remote Sensing, 2023, Vol. 15, No. 17, Art. 4131. DOI: 10.3390/rs15174131.

56. Arya S., Dubey S.R., Moorthi S.M., Dhar D., Singh S.K. 3D-CmT: 3D-CNN Meets Transformer for Hyperspectral Image Classification, In: Cho M.; Laptev I.; Tran D.; Yao A.; Zha H. B. (eds), Computer Vision – ACCV 2024 Workshops: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 15483. Singapore: Springer, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-2644-1_23.

57. Marmanis D., Datcu M., Esch T., Stilla U. Deep Learning Earth Observation Classification Using ImageNet Pretrained Networks, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2016, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 105-109. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2499239.

58. Zhang H., Li Y., Jiang Y., Wang P., Shen Q., Shen C. Hyperspectral Classification Based on Lightweight 3-D-CNN with Transfer Learning, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, Vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 5813-5828. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2902568.

59. Yang J., Zhao Y., Chan J. C.-W. Learning and Transferring Deep Joint Spectral–Spatial Features for Hyperspectral Classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, Vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 4729-4742. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2698503.

60. Wang H., Cheng Y., Wang X. A Novel Hyperspectral Image Classification Method Using Class-Weighted Domain Adaptation Network, Remote Sensing, 2023, Vol. 15, No. 4, Art. 999. DOI: 10.3390/rs15040999.

61. Penatti O.A.B., Nogueira K., Santos J.A. dos. Do Deep Features Generalize from Everyday Objects to Remote Sensing and Aerial Scenes Domains?, 2015 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2015, pp. 44-51. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2015.7301382.

62. Chen T., Kornblith S., Norouzi M., Hinton G. A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations, arXiv, 2020. arXiv:2002.05709. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2002.05709.

63. Xu J., Tang H., Ren Y., Peng L., Zhu X., He L. Multi-level Feature Learning for Contrastive Multi-view Clustering, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 16030-16039. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01558.

64. Wang Y.; Albrecht C.M.; Ait Ali Braham N.; Mou L.; Zhu X.X. Self-Supervised Learning in Remote Sensing: A Review, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2022, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 213-247. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2022.3198244.

65. Ayuba D. L.; Guillemaut J.-Y.; Marti-Cardona B.; Mendez Maldonado O. SpecBPP: A Self-Supervised Learning Approach for Hyperspectral Representation and Soil Organic Carbon Estimation, arXiv, 2025. arXiv:2507.19781. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.19781.

66. Liu B., Yu X., Zhang P. A Semi-Supervised Convolutional Neural Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, Vol. 8, No. 9, pp. 839-848. DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2017.1331053.

67. Wang L., Hao S., Wang Q., Wang Y. Semi-Supervised Classification for Hyperspectral Imagery Based on Spatial-Spectral Label Propagation, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, Vol. 97, pp. 123-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.08.016.

68. Zhang D., Ren Y., Liu C., Han Z., Wang J. Weighted Contrastive Prototype Network for Few-Shot Hyperspectral Image Classification with Noisy Labels, Remote Sensing, 2024, Vol. 16, No. 18, Art. 3527. DOI: 10.3390/rs16183527.

69. Ait Ali Braham N., Wang Y., Albrecht C.M., Mou L., Zhu X.X. Self-Supervised Learning for Few-Shot Hyperspectral Image Classification, arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2206.12117. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.12117.

70. Kumar V., Singh R.S., Rambabu M., Dua Y. Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification:

A survey, Computer Science Review, 2024, Art. 100658. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100658.

Скачивания

##article.published##:

2026-07-07

##article.issue##:

##article.section##:

SECTION III. MACHINE LEARNING AND DATA PROCESSING

DOI:

Keywords:

Hyperspectral images, data processing, machine learning, deep learning, transformers, convolutional neural networks (CNN), classification, dimensionality reduction, transfer learning, self-supervised learning

##submission.сitation##:

Filonova М. А. , Shirobokova S. N. MODERN METHODS OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE PROCESSING: SYSTEM ANALYSIS, ALGORITHMS AND PROSPECTS FOR APPLICATION IN CONSTRUCTION DIAGNOSTICS. IZVESTIYA SFedU. ENGINEERING SCIENCES. – 2026. - № 3. – ##article.page##. 188-208.